Department of Human Resources v. Deason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Act did not create a new right, rather it provided an avenue to enforce an existing obligation
• one of the purposes of UIFSA was to legislate that “foreign support orders are unmodifiable, except by FFCCSOA, Ga. L. 1997, pp. 1613,1619-1620, § 7 (OCGA § 19-6-26)”
• trial court erred in ignoring FFCCSOA, which preempted URESA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).