Skip to main content

Polk v. State

Citations

  • 749 S.W.2d 813
  • 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 32
  • 1988 WL 18669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • case involved allegation that original thief of stolen property was unknown to grand jury; court concluded that “grand jury due diligence must be proven by the State only after the evidence reveals that the original thief’s identity was known or capable of being discovered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Teague, Onion, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.