Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/6/1987
Polk v. State
Citations
- 729 S.W.2d 749
- 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for an objection to be timely, it must be lodged “at the earliest opportunity,” or “as soon as the ground for objection becomes apparent”
- holding that for an objection to be timely, it must be lodged “at the earliest opportunity,” or “as soon as the ground for objection becomes apparent”
- holding that objections made after questions are answered do not preserve error for appeal
- holding that for an objection to be timely, it must be lodged A at the earliest opportunity, @ or A as soon as the ground for objection becomes apparent @
- “gambling that the answer to a question calling for objectionable matter will be favorable, and then objecting when it proves not to be”
- holding to preserve error on appeal by way of objection alone, “the objection must come before the . . . question manifestly calling for objectionable testimony is answered in front of the factfinder” (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-13· cited 621×
- De La Paz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-18· cited 256×
- Ex Parte CrispenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-20· cited 64×
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-02-24· cited 61×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-15· cited 50×
- Juhasz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-06-24· cited 46×
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-27· cited 45×
- Tell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-09· cited 41×
- Mai v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-02-09· cited 38×
- Tinlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-17· cited 31×
- Richard Ryan Black v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-08-08· cited 31×
- Beckley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-17· cited 24×
- K.P.S., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-08· cited 14×
- Harkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-12-20· cited 7×
- Charleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-30· cited 4×
- Guajardo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-02-03· cited 2×
- Matter of KpsTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-10-08
- Michael Elizondo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-07-16
- Enrique MaGallon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-06-09
- Michael Shane Gardner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-05-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.