Skip to main content

Polk v. State

Citations

  • 729 S.W.2d 749
  • 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for an objection to be timely, it must be lodged “at the earliest opportunity,” or “as soon as the ground for objection becomes apparent”
  • holding that for an objection to be timely, it must be lodged “at the earliest opportunity,” or “as soon as the ground for objection becomes apparent”
  • holding that objections made after questions are answered do not preserve error for appeal
  • holding that for an objection to be timely, it must be lodged A at the earliest opportunity, @ or A as soon as the ground for objection becomes apparent @
  • “gambling that the answer to a question calling for objectionable matter will be favorable, and then objecting when it proves not to be”
  • holding to preserve error on appeal by way of objection alone, “the objection must come before the . . . question manifestly calling for objectionable testimony is answered in front of the factfinder” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.