Poellnitz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s contention that the prosecutor made improper remarks during closing argument was not preserved for review because of the failure to make a contemporaneous objection
• “It is not improper for a prosecutor to appeal to the jury to convict for the safety of the community, or to argue to the jury the necessity for enforcement of the law and impress on the jury its responsibility in this regard.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cox v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-08-19· cited 23×
• Arnold v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-08-10· cited 12×
• Eleby v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-06-11· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Malcolm v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-09-15· cited 421×
• Gibbons v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-03· cited 353×
• Fuller v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-01-12· cited 227×
• Wright v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-05· cited 210×
• Philmore v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-04-19· cited 76×
• Adams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-03-10· cited 53×
• Roper v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-04-24· cited 45×
• Holiday v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-09-11· cited 25×
• Andrews v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-10-07· cited 13×