Poellnitz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s contention that the prosecutor made improper remarks during closing argument was not preserved for review because of the failure to make a contemporaneous objection
• “It is not improper for a prosecutor to appeal to the jury to convict for the safety of the community, or to argue to the jury the necessity for enforcement of the law and impress on the jury its responsibility in this regard.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).