Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/17/1995
Plauchak v. Boling
Citations
- 653 A.2d 671
- 439 Pa. Super. 156
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 38
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that neighbors who consent to a property line may not unilaterally relocate such boundary to conform with their respective deeds
- noting that an “equitable owner under contract for sale . . . may maintain suit to quiet title”
- noting that an “equitable owner under contract for sale . . . may maintain suit to quiet title”
- noting “location of ... boundary line is a matter for the trier of fact” in action in ejectment and/or to quiet title regarding location of boundary line and ownership of property surrounding boundary line
- recognizing a hedgerow as the boundary line
- recognizing a hedgerow as the boundary line
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowley, Hudock, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-07· cited 62×
- Siskos v. BritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-20· cited 50×
- Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-25· cited 41×
- Moore v. DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-04· cited 38×
- Zeglin v. GahagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 25×
- Sorg v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-08· cited 11×
- Riverwatch Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Restoration Development Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-23· cited 8×
- Jedlicka v. ClemmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-05· cited 7×
- Kinney, B. v. Lacey, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-04-16· cited 7×
- Viall, W. v. Garvin, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-06-10· cited 6×
- Reading Blue Mtn. & Northern R/R Co. v. Mount, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-10-01· cited 1×
- Starling, W. v. Lake Meade Prop., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-25
- Vandelay Holdings, LLC v. JacksonPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2013-08-02
- Reed v. NicarryHuntingdon County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-12-23
- A & F Builders LLC v. David-Lea Co.Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-02-24
- Molinari v. CanaleMonroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-03-11
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sutton v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-04· cited 58×
- Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-16· cited 50×
- Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-03· cited 50×
- Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-15· cited 48×
- Inn Le'Daerda, Inc. v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-06-28· cited 42×
- Brennan v. Shore Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-01-13· cited 39×
- Dimura v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-01-20· cited 38×
- Grossman v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-04-16· cited 25×
- Wittig v. CarlacciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-04· cited 24×
- Reiter v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-01-06· cited 24×
- Miles v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1914-04-20· cited 23×
- Cox's Incorporated v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-11-25· cited 21×
- Plott v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-13· cited 19×
- Schall v. Williams Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1860-07-01· cited 15×
- Newton v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-10-11· cited 14×
- Perkins v. GaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1817-06-17· cited 14×
- Hagey v. DetweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1860-07-01· cited 13×
- Dawson v. CoulterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 13×
- Hoffman v. BozitskoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-06-13· cited 11×
- BUCK v. BrunnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-07-20· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.