Zeglin v. Gahagen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in Baylor, the Supreme Court “dismissed the portion of the privity rules permitting the tacking based on acts or circumstances extrinsic to written deeds.”
• providing the two elements of establishing a consentable boundary are that “each party must have claimed and occupied the land on his side of the line as his own,” and that “such occupation must have continued for the statutory period of twenty-one years”
• “[T]acking is permitted … upon sufficient and credible proof of delivery of possession of land not within (but contiguous to) property described by deed of conveyance, which was previously claimed and occupied by the grantor and is taken by the grantee as successor in such interest.”
• fence and row of bushes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).