Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/3/1968

Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.

Citations

431 Pa. 600
246 A.2d 840
1968 Pa. LEXIS 653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

in quiet title action, plaintiffs can recover only on strength of their own title and not upon weakness of defendants' title
\There is a prima facie presumption of the regularity of the acts of public officials which exists until the contrary appear\
\There is a prima facie presumption of the regularity of the acts of public officials which exists until the contrary appear\
“There is a prima facie presumption of the regularity of the acts of public officials which exists until the contrary appear”
“There is a prima facie presumption of the regularity of the acts of public officials which exists until the contrary appear”
“There is a prima facie presumption of the regularity of the acts of public officials which exists until the contrary appear[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Brien, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Musmanno, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.