Grossman v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proceeding under Rule 1061(b)(2) where plaintiffs out of possession are mere equitable owners without right to immediate exclusive possession
• noting plaintiffs’ quiet title action was proper because they were equitable owners of disputed property who did not have present right of possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).