Plair v. E.J. Brach & Sons, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a motion in limine is granted when the movant has demonstrated the evidence is inadmissible on any relevant ground, “for any purpose”
• a motion in limine is granted when the movant has demonstrated the evidence is inadmissible on any relevant ground, “for any purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Starling v. Union Pacific Railroad
  D. Kansas· 2001-09-13· cited 26×
• Thakore v. Universal MacHine Co. of Pottstown, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-09-25· cited 14×
• Wilson v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC.
  N.D. Georgia· 2009-03-30· cited 11×
• Johns v. Village of Sauk Village
  N.D. Illinois· 2000-05-17· cited 3×
• United States v. Rusin
  N.D. Illinois· 1995-06-14· cited 1×
• Aquino v. Automotive Service Industry Ass'n
  N.D. Illinois· 2000-03-30· cited 1×
• Churney v. Village of Downers Grove
  N.D. Illinois· 2000-03-06
• Disbursing Agent of the Hardesty Estate v. Severson (In re Hardesty)
  D. Kansas· 1999-11-03
• McCarthy v. Atwood
  Portsmouth County Circuit Court· 2005-04-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
• Hawthorne Partners v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  N.D. Illinois· 1993-08-25· cited 274×
• United States v. Kevin L. Connelly
  Seventh Circuit· 1989-05-01· cited 95×
• James F. Smith v. General Scanning, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1989-06-08· cited 74×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chicago Miniature Lamp Works
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-12-23· cited 70×

Other cases named Plair v. E.J. Brach & Sons, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Plair v. E.J. Brach & Sons, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 1995-04-20· cited 2×