Skip to main content
· 9/25/2009

Thakore v. Universal MacHine Co. of Pottstown, Inc.

Citations

  • 670 F. Supp. 2d 705
  • 80 Fed. R. Serv. 1192
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88895
  • 2009 WL 3241619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Of course, expert opinion must have an analytically sound basis so that it is not speculation in disguise.”
  • “expert reports under Rule 26 are not independently admissible. . . . It may be noted that the Conference Committee comments to the proposed amendments to Rule 26 state that expert reports themselves are not admissible.”
  • “expert reports under Rule 26 are not independently admissible. . . . It may be noted that the Conference Committee comments to the proposed amendments to Rule 26 state that expert reports themselves are not admissible.”
  • “expert reports under Rule 26 are not independently admissible. . . . It may be noted that the Conference Committee comments to the proposed amendments to Rule 26 state that expert reports themselves are not admissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jeffrey Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.