Skip to main content
· 8/25/1993

Hawthorne Partners v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Citations

  • 831 F. Supp. 1398
  • 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1052
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12060
  • 1993 WL 330506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court may wait to resolve the 17 evidentiary issues at trial, where the evidence can be viewed in its “proper context”
  • “Unless evidence meets this high standard, evidentiary rulings should be deferred until trial so that questions of foundation, relevancy and potential prejudice may be resolved in proper context.”
  • “Unless evidence meets this high standard, evidentiary rulings should be deferred until trial so that questions of foundation, relevancy and potential prejudice may be resolved in proper context.”
  • unless the evidence at issue is clearly inadmissible on all potential grounds, evidentiary rulings should be held in abeyance until trial so it can be viewed in the proper factual context.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conlon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.