Skip to main content

Davidson v. State

Citations

  • 819 S.E.2d 452
  • 304 Ga. 460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant unequivocally invoked his right to silence when he repeatedly said that he had “nothing to say”
  • concluding constitutional error was not harmless, in part because the jury asked for recharge on issues implicated by error
  • rejecting State’s argument that invocation of Miranda during interrogation was invalid because invocation preceded Miranda warnings
  • reviewing error in admitting statement made by the defendant after he invoked his right to remain silent
  • “Nothing 17 in Miranda suggests . . . that the right to remain silent in response to a custodial interrogation attaches only if, and when, law enforcement officers have read the Miranda warning.”
  • “We are unconvinced that any error in the admission of [an alleged co-conspirator’s] statement had an effect on the outcome of the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.