Cuyuch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction because inadmissible hearsay statements could not be considered in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence to support defendant’s conviction
• reversing an affirmance of defendant’s conviction for aggravated battery when the jury considered testimonial and inadmissible hearsay statements as to the circumstances of the crime
• reversing conviction because inadmissible hearsay statements could not be considered in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence to support defendant’s conviction
• reversal required when inadmissible evidence is the sole basis for conviction
• reversal required when inadmissible evidence is the sole basis for conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).