Skip to main content

Dixon v. State

Citations

  • 278 S.E.2d 130
  • 157 Ga. App. 550
  • 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “our courts have held that consistency is not required as between principal actors and those who share guilt as accessories”
  • where evidence “is vague and uncertain, and . . . does not negate the possibility of [defendant’s] presence at the scene,” the trial court does not err by failing to charge on alibi without a proper request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banke, Deen, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.