District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/25/2012
Eisele v. Eisele
Citations
- 91 So. 3d 873
- 2012 WL 1889271
- 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court does not have authority to require a party to obtain life insurance to secure child support payments unless such relief has been requested
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Khouzam, Whatley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arthur v. ArthurSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-14· cited 27×
- Layeni v. LayeniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28· cited 22×
- Lopez v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-12· cited 21×
- Pinion v. PinionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-25· cited 13×
- Williamitis v. WilliamitisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-10· cited 3×
- Broome v. BroomeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.