Pinel v. Pinel

Citations

• 240 U.S. 594
• 36 S. Ct. 416
• 60 L. Ed. 817
• 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1486

Syllabus

<p>When two or more plaintiffs having separate and. distinct demands unite in a single suit, the demand of each must be of the requisite amount to be within the jurisdiction of the District Court; when several plaintiffs unite to. enforce a single title or right in which they have a common and undivided interest that court 'has jurisdiction if they collectively equal the jurisdictional amount.</p> <p>Under par. 1, § 24, Jud. Code, where jurisdiction is based on diverse citizenship, the matter in controversy must appear by distinct averment on face of the bill, or otherwise from proof, to exceed $3,000.</p> <p>In a suit by two children Of a testator, each alleging a-statutory in- . testacy as to himself on the ground that he was omitted from the will through testator’s mistake; and one of them claiming by purchase from another child as to whom a like mistake and statutory intestacy is alleged, one plaintiff seeking to recover two undivided shares of one-eighth, and the other one undivided share of one-eighth, in an estate, the maximum value of which is less than twelve thousand dolíais, held that as it does not satisfactorily appear that the value of the interest of either complainant exceeds three thousand dollars, jurisdiction does not exist.</p> <p>In such a suit, the interests of the complainants are separate and distinct; they cannot be aggregated in determining whether the amount in controversy is sufficient to give jurisdiction.</p>