Meritcare Incorporated Meritcare Ventures, Inc. Quinlan Medical, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1367 did not overrule the Zahn requirement for claims by Rule 20 plaintiffs
• stating that joinder and class action cases both require each plaintiff with a distinct and separate claim to meet the amount in controversy requirement
• noting that the facts and all inferences that may be drawn therefrom must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant
• noting that the facts and all inferences that may be drawn therefrom must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant
• finding “that there is sufficient ambiguity in the statute to make resort to the legislative history appropriate”
• ordering remand to state court when post-removal statements made clear that damages did not exceed jurisdictional threshold “at the moment of removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).