Asociacion Nacional De Pescadores a Pequena Escala O Artesanales De Colombia (Anpac) v. Dow Quimica De Colombia S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the court is considering information submitted after removal” because it “clarif[ies] a petition that previously left the jurisdictional question ambiguous”
• holding that when an affidavit “clarif[ies] a petition that previously left the jurisdictional question ambiguous,” the court may consider the affidavit in determining whether remand is proper
• holding that when an affidavit “clarify[ies] a petition that previously left the jurisdictional question ambiguous,” the court may consider the affidavit in determining whether remand is proper
• holding, in part, that remand was proper where the amount was not otherwise \facially apparent\
• holding, in part, that remand was proper where the amount was not otherwise “facially apparent”
• observing that federal court was examining jurisdictional facts as of the time the case was removed but considering information submitted after removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).