· 5/11/2009
Pina v. Maloney
Citations
- 565 F.3d 48
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10038
- 2009 WL 1285532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- opting to “by-pass the threshold question of whether there has been a state court merits adjudication” when the state court judge “commented[ed] briefly on the merits” of petitioner’s claim
- relying on facts as recounted by SJC supplemented with other facts in the record consistent with SJC’s decision
- choosing to “by-pass the threshold question of whether there has been a state court merits adjudication” where the state court “comment[ed] briefly on the merits” of petitioner’s claim
- “Under these circumstances, counsel’s decision to pursue a defense of misidentification, rather than an alibi defense, can only be viewed as a reasonable, tactical decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Farris, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.