· 1/25/1951
Pimentel v. Houk
Citations
- 101 Cal. App. 2d 884
- 226 P.2d 739
- 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that excessive attachment of property may provide basis for abuse of process claim
- attachment of assets was proper in attempting to collect on a note, where not alleged that debt was otherwise secured
- attachment of assets was proper in attempting to collect on a note, where not alleged that debt was otherwise secured
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.