Skip to main content
· 1/25/1951

Pimentel v. Houk

Citations

  • 101 Cal. App. 2d 884
  • 226 P.2d 739
  • 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that excessive attachment of property may provide basis for abuse of process claim
  • attachment of assets was proper in attempting to collect on a note, where not alleged that debt was otherwise secured
  • attachment of assets was proper in attempting to collect on a note, where not alleged that debt was otherwise secured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.