California Court of Appeal· 1/25/1951
Pimentel v. Houk
Citations
- 101 Cal. App. 2d 884
- 226 P.2d 739
- 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that excessive attachment of property may provide basis for abuse of process claim
- attachment of assets was proper in attempting to collect on a note, where not alleged that debt was otherwise secured
- attachment of assets was proper in attempting to collect on a note, where not alleged that debt was otherwise secured
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-05-22· cited 117×
- Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-09-21· cited 83×
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-03-14· cited 79×
- Batten v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-04-08· cited 78×
- Ion Equipment Corp. v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-10-06· cited 57×
- Nevada Credit Rating Bureau, Inc. v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court· 1972-11-17· cited 52×
- Golden v. DunganCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-09-29· cited 49×
- Laxalt v. McClatchyD. Nevada· 1985-11-18· cited 43×
- Meadows v. Bakersfield Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-05-05· cited 35×
- Farmers Gin Company v. WardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-01-27· cited 34×
- Abraham v. Lancaster Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-01-30· cited 26×
- Seidner v. 1551 Greenfield Owners Assn.California Court of Appeal· 1980-08-04· cited 23×
- McMurray v. U-Haul Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-02· cited 20×
- Institute for Professional Development v. Regis CollegeD. Colorado· 1982-04-09· cited 20×
- Lacy v. Laurentide Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1972-10-24· cited 16×
- Keller v. Ray, Quinney & NebekerD. Utah· 1995-09-06· cited 9×
- Coy v. Advance Automatic Sales Co.California Court of Appeal· 1964-07-02· cited 9×
- DiSalvo v. DiSalvo (In Re DiSalvo)Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-11· cited 1×
- Kensington Land Co. v. ZelnickMiami County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-08-31· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.