Robinson v. Detroit News, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking plaintiffs amendment “filed eight months after the date specified in the scheduling order because of undue delay”
• “Especially in the area of at-will employment, courts recognize losses incident to the reliance upon the job offer itself.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “A party seeking to file a surreply must move the court for leave to file such a surreply.”
• “[T]hese new allegations would be futile because the court has already ruled that the gender-discrimination claim brought under the DCHRA cannot survive the defendant’s motion for summary judgment . . . .”
• “The standard for granting leave to file a surreply is whether the party making the motion would be unable to contest matters presented to the court for the first time in the opposing party’s reply.” (cleaned up)
• motion to amend denied due to undue delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).