Skip to main content

Pierce v. State

Citations

  • 696 S.W.2d 899
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court erred by overruling a challenge for cause to a venireperson who said she could not consider the full range of punishment
  • concluding that the trial court erred by overruling a challenge for cause to a venireperson who said she could not consider the full range of punishment
  • holding that the trial court erroneously denied the defendant’s challenge for cause when a panel member said that he could not consider granting probation in a murder case
  • holding that the trial court erroneously denied the defendant’s challenge for cause when a panel member said that he could not consider granting probation in a murder case
  • holding that the trial court erroneously denied the defendant = s challenge for cause when a panel member said that he could not consider granting probation in a murder case
  • defendant has the right to challenge for cause any juror who could not give the minimum punishment, including probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.