Skip to main content

Fox v. State

Citations

  • 717 N.E.2d 957
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 1846
  • 1999 WL 956473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a videotaped statement was cumulative of the testimony of the two victims
  • affirming the trial court’s denial of challenge to juror who knew an individual on the witness list but stated he would do his “very” best to render a fair and impartial verdict
  • defendant failed to establish harm because the trial court’s admission of the video tape was cumulative and not the only direct evidence of the events because two witnesses testified at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Darden, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.