Skip to main content

Comer v. State

Citations

  • 839 N.E.2d 721
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2381
  • 2005 WL 3454779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is a reviewing court’s duty to correct sentencing errors, sua sponte if necessary
  • holding that it is our duty to correct sentencing errors, sua sponte, if necessary
  • internal citation and quotation Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-CR-830 | December 20, 2019 Page 15 of 19 marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Darden, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.