E.D. Pennsylvania· 5/31/2005
Pichler v. UNITE
Citations
- 228 F.R.D. 230
- 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2482
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10334
- 2005 WL 1283659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that UNITE “could not have violated [their] own DPPA-protected privacy interests because the motor vehicle abstracts contain no information about them”
- stating that UNITE \could not have violated [their] own DPPA-protected privacy interests because the motor vehicle abstracts contain no information about them\
- stating that UNITE “could not have violated [their] own DPPA-protected privacy interests because the motor vehicle abstracts contain no information about them”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dalzell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pichler v. UNITEThird Circuit· 2008-09-09· cited 196×
- Roth v. GuzmanSixth Circuit· 2011-06-13· cited 99×
- James Kehoe v. Fidelity Federal Bank & TrustEleventh Circuit· 2005-08-26· cited 54×
- Agostino v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.D. New Jersey· 2009-02-11· cited 47×
- Murray v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2005-11-17· cited 35×
- Pichler v. UNITE (Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees AFL-CIO)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-08-30· cited 12×
- Rios v. Direct Mail Express, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2006-05-23· cited 7×
- In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-08-23· cited 7×
- Pichler v. UNITEE.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-10-17· cited 6×
- Pichler v. UNITEThird Circuit· 2009-11-13· cited 5×
- Gaston v. Exelon Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-11-30· cited 5×
- Janson v. Legalzoom.Com, Inc.W.D. Missouri· 2010-12-14· cited 3×
- Pichler v. UNITEE.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-08-12· cited 2×
- Best v. BerardN.D. Illinois· 2011-11-15· cited 2×
- Doran v. Missouri Department of Social ServicesW.D. Missouri· 2008-05-02
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 2,054×
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court· 2003-11-12· cited 1,983×
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 924×
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 890×
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationThird Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 840×
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 683×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 621×
- Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1998-10-02· cited 578×
- Baby Neal v. CaseyThird Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
- Eisenberg v. GagnonThird Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-06-27· cited 418×
- Doe v. ChaoSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 396×
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyThird Circuit· 1998-11-12· cited 337×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court· 1959-05-04· cited 317×
- Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co.Second Circuit· 2001-10-09· cited 312×
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-11-17· cited 258×
- Molski v. GleichNinth Circuit· 2003-02-06· cited 203×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.