Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statutes should be interpreted so as to “fit, if possible, all parts into an harmonious whole”
• holding that statutes should be interpreted so as to “fit, if possible, all parts into an harmonious whole”
• holding that statutes should be interpreted so as to “fit, if possible, all parts into an harmonious whole”
• holding that statutes should be interpreted so as to “fit, if possible, all parts into a harmonious whole”
• holding that statutes should be interpreted so as to “fit, if possible, all parts into an harmonious whole”
• holding that the title of a statutory provision “though not limiting the plain meaning of the text, is nonetheless a useful aid in resolving an ambiguity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).