California Court of Appeal· 8/29/2007
Philipson & Simon v. Gulsvig
Citations
- 64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 504
- 154 Cal. App. 4th 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- justifiable reliance as an element of intentional misrepresentation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bedsworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cole v. Patricia a. Meyer & Associates, APCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-06-08· cited 79×
- Raining Data Corp. v. BarrenecheaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-06-26· cited 76×
- Bower v. AT&T Mobility, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-06-29· cited 62×
- Mission Beverage Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-09-25· cited 52×
- Mallard v. Progressive Choice InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-09-15· cited 22×
- Byrnes v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-13· cited 1×
- Jung v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2026-06-25
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 935×
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 719×
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-01-21· cited 692×
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-02-26· cited 627×
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court· 1996-12-12· cited 513×
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court· 1983-12-22· cited 477×
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-10-02· cited 378×
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-11-15· cited 348×
- Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-05-22· cited 149×
- Huntingdon Life Sciences, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-06-01· cited 149×
- Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-06-30· cited 143×
- DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-02-14· cited 105×
- Chavez v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-12-24· cited 99×
- Larcher v. WanlessCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-12-23· cited 89×
- Jespersen v. Zubiate-BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-12-18· cited 89×
- Wilhelm v. Pray, Price, Williams & RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-11-07· cited 82×
- Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal· 1946-01-15· cited 69×
- Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court· 1997-08-18· cited 57×
- Law Offices of Dixon R. Howell v. ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-05-27· cited 41×
- Continental Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal· 1997-05-20· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.