Skip to main content
· 11/7/1986

Wilhelm v. Pray, Price, Williams & Russell

Citations

  • 186 Cal. App. 3d 1324
  • 231 Cal. Rptr. 355
  • 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in fraud action, plaintiff must show justifiable reliance, “i.e. circumstances were such to make it reasonable for plaintiff to accept defendant’s statements without an independent inquiry”
  • in fraud action, plaintiff must show justifiable reliance, “i.e. circumstances were such to make it reasonable for plaintiff to accept defendant’s statements without an independent inquiry”
  • setting forth elements of fraud claim under California law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.