· 11/7/1986
Wilhelm v. Pray, Price, Williams & Russell
Citations
- 186 Cal. App. 3d 1324
- 231 Cal. Rptr. 355
- 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in fraud action, plaintiff must show justifiable reliance, “i.e. circumstances were such to make it reasonable for plaintiff to accept defendant’s statements without an independent inquiry”
- in fraud action, plaintiff must show justifiable reliance, “i.e. circumstances were such to make it reasonable for plaintiff to accept defendant’s statements without an independent inquiry”
- setting forth elements of fraud claim under California law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.