Skip to main content
· 2/27/2001

Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 240 F.3d 1268
  • 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1101
  • 7 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 79
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1053
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,455
  • 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1841
  • 2001 WL 194509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that nominal damages are not available to plaintiffs under the FMLA
  • providing that leave to supplement pleadings “should be liberally granted unless good reason exists for denying leave, such as prejudice to the defendants” (quotations and citation omitted)
  • explaining that recovery under the FMLA is unambiguously limited to actual monetary losses
  • finding that a dismissal of an untimely filed claim without prejudice was, “in real world terms,” a dismissal with prejudice because “any attempt by [the plaintiff] to refile her claims . . . would be out of time”
  • finding that a dismissal of an untimely filed claim without prejudice was, “in real world terms,” a dismissal with prejudice because “any attempt by [the plaintiff] to refile her claims . . . would be out of time”
  • treating district court’s dismissal as “with prejudice” because any attempt by the plaintiff to refile her claims after dismissal would be out of time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Briscoe, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.