Filrep S. A. v. Barry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court could properly take judicial notice of facts in an earlier case indicating that the defendant had committed perjury as such facts are capable of immediate and accurate demonstration by resort to easily accessible sources of indisputable accuracy
• noting that Davis “expressed a more flexible approach to the question of judicial notice” than prior cases
• trial judge properly took judicial notice of prior perjury conviction of party through examination of record from earlier case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).