· 4/24/2000
Peterson v. Randhava
Citations
- 729 N.E.2d 75
- 313 Ill. App. 3d 1
- 246 Ill. Dec. 75
- 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the substance of a motion, not its title, determines how a court should treat it
- trial court’s dismissal of action by granting summary judgment sua sponte was improper because parties received no notice and opportunity to respond
- “the substance of the motion, not the title, should determine how the court should treat a motion”
- “[T]he substance of the motion, not the title, -9- No. 1-25-0507 should determine how the court should treat a motion.”
- the substance of a motion, not its title, determines how a court should treat it
- trial court’s dismissal of action by granting summary judgment sua sponte was improper because parties received no notice and opportunity to respond
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frossard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.