Singer v. Brookman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that for parties to be in privity with one another for purposes of res judicata, they must have \the same legal rights or interests\
• stating that for parties to be in privity with one another for purposes of res judicata, they must have \the same legal rights or interests\
• finding that the attorney fees awarded by the circuit court without an evidentiary hearing were not unreasonable when the court received “a detailed breakdown of fees and expenses by [the] defendant’s counsel”
• finding the amount of attorney fees awarded by the trial court without an evidentiary hearing to the defendant as Rule 137 sanctions was not unreasonable and was properly determined after receiving “a detailed breakdown of fees and expenses” by the defendant’s counsel
• “Plaintiffs’ actions are really just a different means to the same end and are identical for purposes of res judicata.”
• “Plaintiffs' actions are really just a different means to the same end and are identical for purposes of res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).