Agnew v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion in trial court’s ruling that methodology of “backward extrapolation” was not generally accepted
• finding no abuse of discretion in trial court’s ruling that methodology of “backward extrapolation” was not generally accepted
• “The admissibility of evidence is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its decision will not be reversed on review absent a clear abuse of that discretion.”
• “The admissibility of evidence is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its decision will not be reversed on review absent a clear abuse of that discretion.”
• “a reviewing court can sustain the decision of the trial court to admit or exclude evidence for any appropriate reason, regardless of whether the trial court relied on that reason or whether the trial court’s reasoning was correct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).