Skip to main content
· 2/8/1991

Demos v. National Bank of Greece

Citations

  • 567 N.E.2d 1083
  • 209 Ill. App. 3d 655
  • 153 Ill. Dec. 856
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reliance on a promise to lend money at an indefinite interest rate was not reasonable
  • holding that reliance on a promise to lend money at an indefinite interest rate was not reasonable
  • holding that because alleged promise to enter into a loan agreement failed to contain the interest, duration, or terms of repayment, it was too indefinite to be enforceable, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel was inapplicable as a matter of law
  • holding that because alleged promise to enter into a loan agreement failed to contain the interest, duration, or terms of repay- ment, it was too indefinite to be enforceable, and the doc- trine of promissory estoppel was inapplicable as a matter of law
  • finding ambiguous a promise to lend money that did not specify the interest rate
  • promissory estoppel claim dismissed because alleged promise was too indefinite to be enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coccia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.