Skip to main content

Peters v. State

Citations

  • 874 So. 2d 677
  • 2004 WL 1161730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]lose cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving a doubt about the juror’s impartiality.”
  • “In this district, close cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving a doubt about the juror’s impartiality.”
  • “While the decision to accept or dismiss a putative juror is considered an exercise in discretion, we view the seating of a juror as to whom there is a reasonable doubt concerning impartiality an abuse of discretion and thus ‘manifest error.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.