Jaffe v. APPLEBAUMM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that juror should have been dismissed for cause where his answers indicated that plaintiffs would be starting off with a “half strike against them”
• concluding court abused its discretion in denying challenge for cause where juror admitted that plaintiffs would be starting out with \a half strike\ against them
• concluding court abused its discretion in denying challenge for cause where juror admitted that plaintiffs would be starting out with \a half strike\ against them
• concluding court abused its discretion in denying challenge for cause where juror admitted that plaintiffs would be starting out with \a half strike\ against them
• noting that neither party attempted to rehabilitate juror who expressed bias towards defense surgeons but concluding “that any attempt to rehabilitate [the juror] would have been futile in light of his responses to [plaintiffs’ counsel’s] questions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).