Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 638 So. 2d 976
  • 1994 WL 245578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that juror's response to the judge that \I'll be impartial because that's my character\ was not sufficient to erase the doubt created by his other comments and, thus, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to strike the juror for cause
  • holding juror who had contacts with U.S. Attorney’s Office, stated that he had “deep feelings in this kind of case,” and made equivocal statements that “I hope that I can” be impartial and “I’ll be impartial because that’s my character” should have been stricken for cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.