Skip to main content

Peters v. State

Citations

  • 31 S.W.3d 704
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 6896
  • 2000 WL 1511721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that nothing in current article 37.07, section 3(a) makes evidence of defendant’s suitability for probation inadmissible per se
  • holding that suitability for probation can be relevant to a jury’s recommendation
  • infra suitability for community supervision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murry B. Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.