Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/21/1989
Drew v. State
Citations
- 777 S.W.2d 74
- 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 138
- 1989 WL 65808
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant does not “open the door” to extraneous conduct evidence admitted before defendant gave evidence that would otherwise “open the door”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Teague, Miller, Campbell, Duncan, White, Berchelmann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-28· cited 267×
- Grunsfeld v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-06-04· cited 82×
- Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-03-26· cited 44×
- Peters v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-10-12· cited 40×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-21· cited 31×
- Slott v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1992-01-08· cited 14×
- Henson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-11-21· cited 14×
- Tyrone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-09-22· cited 12×
- Rankin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-07-28· cited 9×
- Kingsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-02-14· cited 8×
- Bagley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-13· cited 7×
- Flores v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-11-04· cited 5×
- Cavazos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-22· cited 1×
- Juan Carlos Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-03-26
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.