Skip to main content
· 9/11/2012

Peter Eche v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Citations

  • 694 F.3d 1026
  • 2012 WL 3939622
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the NMI government “retained nearly exclusive control over immigration to the territory” until the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 took effect on November 28, 2009 (citations omitted)
  • holding § 1421(c)’s exhaustion requirement is “prudential” and allowing a futility exception
  • holding section 1421(c) 's exhaustion requirement is non-jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Callahan, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.