Skip to main content
· 7/14/2003

Eshghan Khodagholian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Citations

  • 335 F.3d 1003
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7742
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6079
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14058
  • 2003 WL 21638874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this Court determines intent by considering factors such as “the alien’s family ties, property holdings, and business affiliations within the United States”
  • noting that a trip of “unusual duration ... could represent substantial evidence of abandonment”
  • accounting for the fact that at least half the time the petitioner was in a foreign country was involuntary due to an unanticipated tax claim
  • “[w]hether [the 30 petitioner] abandoned his [permanent residence status] is an intrinsically fact-specific question”
  • “[F]rom these facts, it cannot reasonably be concluded that the INS carried its burden by clear, unequivocal, and convinc- ing evidence . . . . Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and vacate the order of removal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Berzon, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.