Skip to main content
· 6/7/2004

Trevor A. Laing v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Citations

  • 370 F.3d 994
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11084
  • 2004 WL 1238961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing possible exceptions to the general rule requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies
  • finding a 11 petitioner must exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing a petition under 28 12 U.S.C. § 2241
  • describing these exceptions in the context of administrative remedies and concluding that “[s]imilar concerns govern a court’s determination of whether to excuse a failure to exhaust judicial remedies”
  • describing these exceptions in the context of administrative remedies and concluding that “[s]imilar concerns govern a court’s determination of whether to excuse a failure to 22 exhaust judicial remedies”
  • dismissing habeas petition because alien could have filed a petition for review, and review by the Ninth Circuit would have not been futile because the court could have considered the jurisdictional fact contested by the alien
  • dismissing habeas petition because alien failed to file a timely petition for direct review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan, Hall, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.