S.D. Florida· 12/16/1999
Pesin v. Osorio Rodriguez
Citations
- 77 F. Supp. 2d 1277
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19741
- 1999 WL 1249760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- focusing on parents’ actions and shared intentions where children were four and six at the time of the alleged wrongful retention, and finding that parents lacked a shared intention for children to remain in Florida
- court would focus on parents’ actions and shared intentions where children were four and six at time of alleged wrongful retention
- on finding that parents lacked shared intent that children stay in Florida, court concluded that Venezuela was habitual residence immediately before date that family had intended to depart Florida
- settled purpose 19 of family trip was a vacation of finite duration
- settled purpose of family trip was a vacation of finite duration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lenard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal MozesNinth Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 276×
- Henry G. Baxter v. Jody Amanda BaxterThird Circuit· 2005-09-15· cited 130×
- Whallon v. LynnFirst Circuit· 2000-10-27· cited 129×
- Mendez Lynch v. Mendez LynchM.D. Florida· 2002-08-13· cited 64×
- Koc v. KocE.D. New York· 2001-01-18· cited 46×
- Nicolson v. PappalardoFirst Circuit· 2010-04-30· cited 44×
- Ahumada Cabrera v. LozanoS.D. Florida· 2004-05-18· cited 32×
- March v. LevineM.D. Tennessee· 2000-10-04· cited 23×
- Lopez v. AlcalaM.D. Florida· 2008-02-29· cited 20×
- Bocquet v. OuzidS.D. Florida· 2002-07-18· cited 20×
- Yoo Kyung Choi v. Chee Kwan KimS.D. New York· 2005-12-08· cited 14×
- Carmen Flores Castro v. Bertha Hernandez RenteriaNinth Circuit· 2020-08-19· cited 8×
- Morales v. MartinezM.D. Florida· 2014-06-19· cited 8×
- Avendano v. SmithD. New Mexico· 2011-08-19· cited 7×
- Armiliato v. Zaric-ArmiliatoS.D. New York· 2001-05-03· cited 7×
- González v. PrestonM.D. Alabama· 2015-05-20· cited 7×
- Leslie v. NobleS.D. Florida· 2005-06-30· cited 5×
- Paz v. Mejia De PazS.D. New York· 2001-10-29· cited 2×
- In Re DDM.D. Florida· 2006-07-13· cited 2×
- Dallemagne v. DallemagneM.D. Florida· 2006-07-13· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperSixth Circuit· 1996-03-13· cited 354×
- Edward M. Feder v. Melissa Ann Evans-FederThird Circuit· 1995-08-24· cited 250×
- Karin Sofia Ohlander, in the Matter of Julia Larson, a Minor Child, F/k/a Karin Sofia Larson v. Mark Andrew LarsonTenth Circuit· 1997-06-03· cited 220×
- Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich David Harper and Shirley HarperSixth Circuit· 1993-01-22· cited 212×
- Bjorn Michael Rydder v. Susan Marie RydderEighth Circuit· 1995-02-13· cited 117×
- Lops v. LopsEleventh Circuit· 1998-05-07· cited 114×
- Enrique Nunez-Escudero v. Stephanie Rose Tice-MenleyEighth Circuit· 1995-06-26· cited 107×
- Haim Shalit v. Cheryl Coppe, A/K/A Cheryl Gardner ShalitNinth Circuit· 1999-09-14· cited 91×
- Levesque v. LevesqueD. Kansas· 1993-03-02· cited 31×
- Freier v. FreierE.D. Michigan· 1996-10-04· cited 27×
- Wanninger v. WanningerD. Massachusetts· 1994-04-15· cited 19×
- David S. v. Zamira S.NYC Family Court· 1991-01-31· cited 17×
- David B. v. Helen O.NYC Family Court· 1995-03-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.