Haim Shalit v. Cheryl Coppe, A/K/A Cheryl Gardner Shalit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding parent did not possess custody rights and therefore did not reach whether parent was exercising custody rights
• recognizing that “reconsideration is appropriate only in very limited circumstances”
• applying the choice-of-law provisions only after finding that the children's habitual residence was where the petitioner claimed
• noting that “reconsideration is appropriate only in very limited circumstances”
• finding no abuse of discretion by district court in denying a motion for reconsideration when movant offered no reason for failure to provide the evidence when litigating the underlying motion
• the court entertaining a Hague petition must examine whether the removal or retention of a child was “wrongful” under the law of the child’s habitual residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).