· 1/9/2001
In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal Mozes
Citations
- 239 F.3d 1067
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 359
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 429
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that shared intent can exist “despite the fact that one parent may have had qualms” about the agreement
- discussing the intent, expectations, and knowledge of the child in relation to the acclimatization inquiry
- placing greater weight on the shared intentions of the par- ents
- “To achieve the uniformity of application across countries, upon which depends the realization of the Convention’s goals, courts must be able to reconcile their decisions with those reached by other courts in similar situations.”
- “When a child has no clearly established habitual residence elsewhere, it may become habitually resident even in a place where it was intended to live only for a limited time.”
- “Michal and the children left for the United States with a temporary visa, casting considerable doubt on whether they would be allowed to remain here indefinitely even if they wishes to”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kozinski, Thomas, Illston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.