Wanninger v. Wanninger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• de-emphasizing letters petitioner wrote to third party and relying on petitioner’s statements and letters of reconciliation made to his wife
• refusing to construe father’s personal letters to wife and priest as sufficient evidence of acquiescence where father consistently attempted to keep in contact with child
• de-empha-sizing letters the petitioner wrote to a third party and relying on the petitioner’s statements and letters of reconciliation made to his wife
• finding no acquiescence where, inter alia, petition was filed within three months of wrongful removal and within few days of learning that petitioner’s marriage was irreconcilable
• de-emphasizing letters petitioner wrote to a third party and relying on the petitioner’s statements and letters of reconciliation made to his wife
• finding no acquiescence where petitioner wrote letter of reconciliation to his wife, agreed to their children’s stay outside habitual residence during reconciliation period, and kept in continual contact with his wife and children by writing letters and calling on telephone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).