Skip to main content
E.D. Texas· 12/1/2017

Personal Audio, LLC v. Google, Inc.

Citations

  • 280 F. Supp. 3d 922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “venue is determined under § 1400(b) by the facts and situation as of the date suit is filed”
  • holding that Google’s GGC servers were not regular and established places of business
  • holding, because the applicable venue statute used present tense language, “venue facts are to be examined as of the date the suit is filed”
  • questioning whether cell phone towers could be a regular and established place of business for wireless phone service providers if Google's servers were to qualify
  • rejecting the argument that Google servers in local ISP facilities constituted a regular and established place of business
  • “This court concludes that venue is determined under § 1400(b) by the facts and situation as of the date suit is filed. This is the plain reading of § 1400(b), the pertinent provisions of which are written in the present tense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Personal Audio, LLC v. Google, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.