In Re Cordis Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “if a rational and substantial legal argument can be made in support of the rule in question, the case is not appropriate for mandamus”
• suggesting that defendant’s employees’ homes, which were used to store the defendant’s “literature, documents and products,” could constitute a “regular and established place of busi- ness”
• refusing to find abuse of discretion in lower court’s finding of acts of infringement based on continuous solicitation coupled with technical consultations and demonstrations
• finding venue proper in district where defendant’s employ- ees stored defendant’s “literature, documents and prod- ucts” in their in-district homes rather than in a separately leased or owned warehouse of the defendant
• The “issue of infringement” is “a question to be determined at trial” and “is not reached on the merits in considering venue requirements.”
• The “issue of infringement” is “a question to be determined at trial” and “is not reached on the merits in considering venue requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).