Skip to main content

Cox v. State

Citations

  • 780 N.E.2d 1150
  • 2002 WL 31859556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address Cox’s incredible dubiosity claim because more than one witness testified as to events surrounding crime
  • declining to address incredible dubiosity claim because more than one witness testified to events surrounding the crime
  • failure to respond to an issue is akin to failing to file a brief; for claimant to succeed, he need only establish prima facie error
  • failure to respond to an issue is akin to failing to file a brief; for claimant to succeed, he need only establish prima facie error
  • “A sentence enhancement may still be upheld when a trial court improperly applies an aggravator but other valid aggravators exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Bailey, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.